We survived 4 days of HBL, and today is also the start of PSLE. 💪
This time round, I never set up any schedule for the girls mainly because I wasn't very ready and since it's only 10 days 说长不长，说短不短. I have so much things not settle yet so I decided to let nature take its course. 🛶 船到桥头自然直。
Day time was pretty manageable, because the girls are busy with online work and homework. I prepare their snacks earlier which I shared on my IGS, or u can swipe left to see.
I started this in May which I shared on my blog (link in bio). Starting, they do not know how to control and finish the snacks before the "school" ends. Too bad no replenish. 😝
After awhile they get a hang of it and don't bother me about snacks, hungry etc.
They only keep calling me for IT stuff (no sound, no screen, change backgrounc) which is getting on my nerves especially when I'm trying to listen to my lecturer talking. 👹
It's not easy for us parents, it's also not easy for the kids.. although it seems like they are enjoying.. but occasionally they miss their friends, the social life they have and their emotions let out channel is greatly affected. Plus the uncertainty for those who are preparing for exam.
Sometimes not having a schedule, letting ourselves to relax awhile, it's good for our mental health.
Not sure how long this "one step forward, 2 steps back" restrictions will last.. 😅 it's good to rethink by changing our mindset so we can handle this pandemic better.
All the best to those who have kids doing PSLE! And may we all stay positive and love. 🥰
busy with busy in 在 [單字] busy (in)的用法- 看板Eng-Class - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
在line群的多益英文討論群上看到這個問題
我也瞬間困惑了，因為書上確實有這樣寫
（以下圖片跟論壇網址皆來自line群）
可是有人提到英文字典上沒有in的用法
對岸的資料
國外論壇
https://www.google.com.tw/amp/s/www.englishforums.com/English/BusyInWith/zgnzq
/amp.htm
縮網址： https://goo.gl/uUoAVe
然後我問了TutorABC的美國人老師，他給我的回覆是沒用過in在後面
可是按照書本跟奇摩字典的用法，是省略的話，那應該要可以還原啊
但是還原的話，就美國人跟外國論壇的說法就不行
為什麼會有這樣的情形？有沒有專業科系的鄉民可以解惑一下
感謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.241.42.202
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1489509507.A.134.html
※ 編輯: Robinham (111.241.42.202), 03/15/2017 00:41:28
※ 編輯: Robinham (111.241.42.202), 03/15/2017 00:45:02
其實我的問題是這樣
如果in是被省略，那麼加回去應該是對的，可以加在動作前面
但是老美跟國外論壇都說是錯的，連對岸論壇也說是錯的。。。
然後只有在台灣雅虎字典跟台灣書籍看到這樣的用法
有沒有可以提出以前什麼時候native speaker他們用過busy 後面in加動詞
※ 編輯: Robinham (111.241.41.26), 03/15/2017 22:17:14
※ 編輯: Robinham (111.241.41.26), 03/15/2017 22:18:05
比較好奇怎麼確定他們是母語人士？
看了一下COCA近百個用法都是接 名詞
動詞2014有看到，另一個沒看到（可能沒注意到）
另外問了英國老師也說是錯的。。。。說至少百年內是錯的
至多查不到也沒看過這種用法
即使莎士比亞的文學古用法網路上都查得到
這種查不到根本是錯的，也沒有人在用
其實我有點懷疑該不會真的是錯的吧
書上寫的是錯的，然後大家跟著
※ 編輯: Robinham (118.160.35.62), 03/16/2017 10:49:43
... <看更多>