國際船長協會(IFSMA)於今晨發布重磅消息,籲請各船船長為遵守各項國際公約(SOLAS,MLO,MARPOL,ISM,SMS….)發函給船旗國及公司主管(DPA): 在船員遣返,醫療救護,船員情緒,等影響安全之問題未獲解決之前, 船舶將於到達第一港口之後,不在開航!!!Dear Shipmaster, NOTICE TO ALL SHIPMASTERS We, the members of the IFSMA Executive Council and the IFSMA Secretariat do hope that this letter finds you, your crews and all your families safe and well wherever you are. This global COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on all the maritime industry, but it is you the seafarer who must not be forgotten. We hope you are all aware of the work that the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) together with IFSMA and other key non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) are putting in on your behalf to enable crew changes to take place. The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) and the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), supported by its affiliated unions, have been working closely with IFSMA to put pressure on Governments to start taking measures to ensure this happens to keep you, the seafarers, safe and for ships to trade safely around the world. To date, a relatively small number of steps have been taken by relatively few nations, since most are only concentrating on their internal domestic struggles against the global COVID-19 pandemic and are sometimes seemingly oblivious to your plight at sea. Since the pandemic was declared by WHO in February, many Governments and International Organisations rightly declared Force Majeure for keeping you at sea. IFSMA wishes to reiterate that it now considers this no longer appropriate. Shipmasters, their crews and all in authority in the Shipping Industry remain subject to normal contractual conditions in accordance with the ILO’s Maritime Labour Convention and all IMO Codes, Conventions, Rules and Regulations. Easing of Restrictions NOT being Extended Shipmasters share the responsibility of their ship owners and ship operator employers for the safety and welfare of their crew and for the protection of the marine environment and it is for this reason IFSMA writes personally to you today. The IMO has issued industry developed Crew Change Protocols for the guidance of nations. Despite many nations starting to ease lockdown restrictions, not all have been extended to facilitate crew changes; those that have been implemented have been driven by shipowners, crew managers and unions, with little help from nations. Notwithstanding that a recent small number of repatriations and crew changes are showing some signs of becoming easier, IFSMA is increasingly concerned that there is now clear potential for the wholly unwarranted criminalisation of the Shipmaster if a maritime incident takes place in which tiredness and the mental health of their officers and crew are subsequently found to have undermined the safe operation of their ship.
International Federation of Shipmasters‘ Associations IFSMA • IMarEST • 1 Birdcage Walk • London SW1H 9JJ • United Kingdom Phone: +44 20 7261 0450 • Fax: +44 20 3468 2134 • Email: HQ@ifsma.org • Website: www.ifsma.org Beware Fatigue IFSMA wishes to remind all Shipmasters of their responsibility to protect themselves and their crew against attempts of suicides, fatigue, caused by long working days and extended tours of duty, as enshrined in the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping, 1978 and the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (as amended). Your attention is also drawn to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 Regulation 34-1 which clearly states:- “The owner, the charterer, the company operating the ship as defined in regulation IX/1, or any other person shall not prevent or restrict the master of the ship from taking or executing any decision which, in the master’s professional judgement, is necessary for the safety of life at sea and the protection of the marine environment” ISM Code/SMS/MLC The International Safety Management (ISM) Code also states that the Company should ensure that the Safety Management System (SMS) operating on board the ship contains a clear statement emphasising the master's authority. The Company should establish in the SMS that the master has the overriding authority and the responsibility to make decisions with respect to safety and pollution prevention and to request the Company's assistance as and when may be necessary. Finally, IFSMA draws your attention to MLC Regulation 5.1.5, On-board complaints procedures. If, despite your best efforts as master, you feel the safety of your ship and crew is compromised due to lack of support from the shipowner or other factors, because: 1. Your crew is significantly beyond their contract term 2. Your crew is fatigued 3. You are short handed 4. You are concerned about the safe operation of your ship 5. You do not have sufficient PPE including sanitisers/testing (etc) 6. You do not have access to appropriate supplies including medicines 7. You cannot get access to urgent medical and urgent dental services ashore 8. Your crew is not provided free wifi/internet contact with home 9. Your crew want to go home Then: You have a duty and responsibility to report this to the shipowner (whose name and address must be stated on your seafarers’ employment agreement and the MLC Certificate carried onboard). Put the interests of your crew first. If they are not being granted their full MLC entitlements, such as: repatriation, access to medical care, entitlement to nutritious food, water and other supplies, then register their complaints with the shipowner.
International Federation of Shipmasters‘ Associations IFSMA • IMarEST • 1 Birdcage Walk • London SW1H 9JJ • United Kingdom Phone: +44 20 7261 0450 • Fax: +44 20 3468 2134 • Email: HQ@ifsma.org • Website: www.ifsma.org Under both SOLAS and the ISM Code you also have an obligation to report significant safety issues to the Shipowner (DPA) and the flag State and ensure you advise your Associations and Unions of what you are doing. You need to do this for your own protection from possible criminalisation in the event of a maritime incident, and for the safety of your crew and others. In the event that the issues you raise are not satisfactorily resolved you are entitled to refuse to sail on entry into your next port. Enclosed with this letter is a list of some of the points you might also wish to consider including in any Report/Complaint to your DPA or Administration Take care and keep safe and remember that IFSMA, the ITF and your unions stand behind you and are here to give you full support. On behalf of the IFSMA Executive Council and the IFSMA Secretariat,
「marine management organisation」的推薦目錄:
marine management organisation 在 觀念座標 Facebook 的最佳解答
※ 2017.10.05 英國—《每日電訊報》Patrick Sawer ※
海濤法師兩信徒在英吉利海峽亂放生觸法
約翰·藍儂唱「你會得現世報」(Instant Karma)時,大概不是說佛教徒在英吉利海峽放生龍蝦會得到「現世報」。但那是真實發生的事件。
兩位台灣海濤法師的信徒,2015 年在布萊頓(Brighton)近海放生了市值五千英鎊的活龍蝦,結果遭到起訴,說他們對海洋環境造成了重大危害。
當時參與放生儀式的佛教徒近一千人,他們僱用船隻,在布萊頓近海進行放生,用意是免於動物被殺生。這個儀式的主旨是為他們自己創造功德。
然而該活動的兩位主辦人因此而觸犯法律,因為他們放生的甲殻動物是外來物種,他們的行為對該區域的海洋環境造成「重大危害」。
英國政府的海洋管理局(Marine Management Organisation, MMO)已經發出懸賞,當地漁夫若捕回他們當年所放生的蝦蟹,每一尾可獲得二十英鎊的獎勵金。
佛教徒因放生而觸法,這在英國是有史以來第一例。兩位被告是銀行家李妮小姐(Ni Li 音譯)、房地產仲介李智雄先生(Li Zhixiong 音譯),他們已經承認確實野放了外來物種。
代表海洋管理局起訴的律師是約瑟夫·米勒(Joseph Miller),他告訴布萊頓的地方法院,他們之所以得知這件事,是當地的漁民在 2015 年 6 月捕捉到外國蝦蟹時才發現。
海洋管理局檢視了布萊頓海港的監視攝影畫面,發現該佛教團體在漁市購買價值兩千五百英鎊的本地蝦蟹,並僱用了三艘船出海。
但調查員發現,李小姐也從格林威治的漁貨批發商泗和行(SeeWoo)買了 361 條美國龍蝦、350 隻(美國)首長黃道蟹。
法庭聽到:李小姐對調查員謊稱她不知道那些蝦蟹是外來物種,還把牠們帶回家放在塩水裡。李小姐後來承認此語不實。
米勒先生表示:「李妮把牠們從倫敦帶到布萊頓,僱用三艘船出海,將牠們釋放到水裡。李智雄說他知道野放外來物種是犯法的行為,但他以為牠們是本土物種。」
當時被野放的甲殻類動物,截至目前被捉回的只有 323 隻,最近當地捕到的美國龍蝦顯示,牠們帶著卵,顯示牠們已經開始繁衍。
法庭也聽到李妮與李智雄之所以購買這麼多外來甲殻動物,是因為他們無法事先預訂本土的蝦蟹。假如他們採用預訂的方式,代表漁民必須大肆捕捉才能滿足他們的需求,違反佛教信仰的初衷。
李先生在庭上表示,他曾經詢問船東大衛·羅斯先生,放生是否需要向當局報備,但船東說只要動物是本土的就可以野放。
兩位被告表示,如果他們知道放生螃蟹龍蝦會危害環境,他們就不會放生。
李先生的辯護律師保羅·塔普塞(Paul Tapsell)表示:「他已經接受:蝦蟹放生事實上與他想達成的目的相反。」
李小姐的辯護律師提姆·萊恩(Tim Ryan)表示:「她無疑是位聰明、勤奮、有智慧的年輕女性,多次擔任義工。她可能是太過天真,今天才會遭到起訴。」
布萊頓法庭判決李小姐必須繳交五千三百英鎊的罰金、李先生五百英鎊。另外,他們必須賠償 MMO 九千英鎊。
法官威廉·艾許沃斯(William Ashworth)表示:「你們的作法造成會帶來什麼樣的後果,我們依然不完全知道。顯然這不是你們的本意。雖然你們並非故意破壞,但至少是相當馬虎大意。你們兩人都有一定的知識水準,知道哪些事能做,哪些事不能做,但你們兩位都對調查員說謊。」
海洋管理局表示,該次放生儀式造成的長久影響,也許永遠無法完面掌握,還警告如果這些外來物種若殺死本土動物的話,可能會對當地漁業造成重大損失。
=== 英國野放動物的法律 ===
根據 1981 年通過的《野生動物與鄉間法》(Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981)、1980 年的《活魚進口法》(Import of Live Fish Act),野放非本土的龍蝦進入英國的海域是違法的。
這是因為龍蝦不但會給本地物種帶來外國疾病,還可能會進行繁衍,威脅到本土物種的生存,甚至導致本土物種的滅絕。
野放外來物種的人,可以處以罰金或六個月以下的有期徒刑。
只有取得執照後才能野放外來物種。
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…/bad-karma-buddhists-released-…/
圖:美國龍蝦、以及舊金山漁人碼頭販售的首長黃道蟹。