關於 necessity law ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#Opinion by Yan Kei｜"In the past, I never thought we need to discuss and emphasize on Nelson Mandela Rules with relation to Hong Kong... There is a great fear that best practices developed by rule-of-law institutions over many decades are under threat."

Read more: https://bit.ly/39cAKkP
________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG

[172131] 38931. 魔法使的新娘：四月細雨催開五月繁花"The Ancient Magus' Bride" April showers bring May flowers. (2017)★★
[172132] 38932. 魔法使的新娘：今日之時最珍貴，明日之時不可待"The Ancient Magus' One today is worth two tomorrows. (2017)★★✚
[172133] 38933. 魔法使的新娘：大公無私／萬事皆有開端"The Ancient Magus' Bride" The balance distinguishes not between gold and lead. / Everything must have a beginning. (2017)★★
[172134] 38934. 魔法使的新娘：真愛勝過一切／仙后"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Love conquers all. / The Faerie Queene. (2017)★★
[172135] 38935. 魔法使的新娘：談論惡魔，他即出現"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Talk of the devil, and he is sure to appear. (2017)★★
[172136] 38936. 魔法使的新娘：不要觸動沉眠之犬"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Let sleeping dogs lie. (2017)★★
[172137] 38937. 魔法使的新娘：充耳不聞者不如真聾"The Ancient Magus' Bride" None so deaf as those who will not hear. (2017)★★
[172138] 38938. 魔法使的新娘：活到老 學到老"The Ancient Magus' Bride" We live and learn. (2017)★★
[172139] 38939. 魔法使的新娘：戀人們總是趕在時鐘前面"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Lovers ever run before the clock. (2017)★★
[172140] 38940. 魔法使的新娘：問路總比迷路好"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Better to ask the way than go astray. (2017)★★

[172141] 38941. 魔法使的新娘：金窩銀窩，不如自己的草窩／一見鍾情"The Ancient Magus' Bride" East, west, home's best. / Looks breed love. (2018)★★
[172142] 38942. 魔法使的新娘：無處比家好／天網恢恢，疏而不漏"The Ancient Magus' Bride" There is no place like home. / God's mill grinds slow but sure. (2018)★★
[172143] 38943. 魔法使的新娘：三思而後行"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Look before you leap. (2018)★★
[172144] 38944. 魔法使的新娘：既往不咎"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Forgive and forget. (2018)★★
[172145] 38945. 魔法使的新娘：慌不擇路"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Any port in a storm. (2018)★★
[172146] 38946. 魔法使的新娘：有失才有得"The Ancient Magus' Bride" You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. (2018)★★
[172147] 38947. 魔法使的新娘：鋌而走險"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Necessity has no law. (2018)★★∿
[172148] 38948. 魔法使的新娘：一分耕耘一分收穫"The Ancient Magus' Bride" As you sow, so shall you reap. (2018)★★
[172149] 38949. 魔法使的新娘：無所求則無所得"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Nothing seek, nothing find. (2018)★★
[172150] 38950. 魔法使的新娘：共生共榮"The Ancient Magus' Bride" Live and let live. (2018)★★

Paradoxical theory of Hong Kong organising U.S. riots (Lee Yee)

Hu Xijin, the Editor-in-Chief of the China state media Global Times, tweeted on Twitter stating his high suspicion of Hong Kong “rioters” infiltrating the United States and organising the riot in U.S..

The speech of this CCP media celebrity, who has the privilege to use Twitter in China, cannot be treated as having “freedom of speech”. This statement led the world, including people in Hong Kong and the U.S. to understand the authenticity of the propaganda of CCP. That also includes claims of having “riots” in Hong Kong, the necessity of Hong Kong national security law, or claims of having over 2 million supporters of the law and all other speeches of government officials from last year. Hu helped people understand the truth behind the words.

Hu said that ‘attacking police stations, smashing shop, blocking roads and breaking public facilities’ are the ‘routines’ of Hong Kong “rioters”, hence Hong Kong ‘rioters’ are the ‘mastermind’ of the violent protests across the U.S.. But he did not mention that those violent protesters in the U.S. robbed shops and did harm to innocent citizens during the protest, and that all these never happened in the Hong Kong protests. Hong Kong protesters destroyed only targeted facilities without hurting people and robbing shops. Signs saying “protect books, no damage”, “we are not thieves, we don’t take without permission” were put on the library and fridge door on the day of occupying legislative council on 1st July.

The death of an African-American man caused by police officers triggered a wave of demonstrations in the U.S.. The four police officers involved in the incident were immediately demised, at least two of them may file a lawsuit. Chauvin, the police officer who kneeled on the victim’s neck was soon arrested and charged for third-degree murder on 29th May.

Since last year in Hong Kong, countless acts of police brutality were clearly seen in live footage, but none of the officers were being charged or investigated. The mysterious deaths of Chan Yin-lam and Chow Tsz-lok , and over 2500 ‘dead body found’ cases were all concluded to be unsuspicious. Police brutality in Hong Kong and the U.S. are treated very differently, thus no justified comparison could be made.

The body of George Floyd, the African-American man killed by the police, was sent to a medical institution for autopsy. The autopsy results stated that the death of Floyd was not caused by suffocation, and that the police officer did not break his neck. His death was caused by other conditions triggered by the violent arrest. Pathological report showed that drug overdose caused his death. His family was unconvinced by the official pathological report so they employed other forensic institutions for a second autopsy. In the U.S., forensic is an independent third-party organisation, if the pathological results from the prosecutor and defendant are different, another autopsy will be conducted by an authorised institution recognised by both parties. In Hong Kong, however, no pathological results were released for the 2500 ‘dead body found’ cases. To close the cases, the police only needed to state that those cases were “unsuspicious”. Suspected death due to police brutality are treated very differently in the two places.

An online post from mainland China stated that Chinese media gloat over the seriousness of racial discrimination in the U.S. and how terrible the violent demonstration in the U.S. is. The author is probably someone who lives in the U.S. and follows closely to the social network of mainland China. The passage is persuasive. His post concerning the truth of the death of the African-American and the worldwide demonstrations was soon censored. Chinese officials want the people to believe only the truth they created – “Hong Kong rioters organised the US riots”.

The truth as claimed by China is always confusing. Chinese officials repeatedly claimed that the Hong Kong riots were organised by the U.S.. And now they claim that Hongkongers are the organisers of the U.S. riots. Is Hong Kong still part of China? And so did China actually organised the U.S. riots? Never mind, because ‘the logic’ and ‘the China logic’ are just too different.