巴黎著名人權和宗教自由律師、學者帕特里夏·杜瓦爾觀察到,當她第一次得知太極門案時,對台灣政府忽視國際批評風險感到驚訝。另一方面,她在法國的經歷告訴她,有時宗教和精神少數派的反對者並沒有考慮到這些風險。杜瓦爾指出,台灣於 2009 年批准並將《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》(ICCPR)和《經濟、社會和文化權利國際公約》(ICESCR)納入其國家法律。這些,正如歐洲人權法院和其他國際司法管轄區所解釋的那樣,包括在稅收和宗教自由決定中,
Patricia Duval, a well-known Paris human rights and religious liberty attorney and scholar, observed that when she first learned of the Tai Ji Men case, she was surprised that the Taiwan government was ignoring the risk of being criticized internationally. On the other hand, her experience in France told her that sometimes opponents of religious and spiritual minorities do not take these risks into account. Duval noted that Taiwan in 2009 ratified and included in its national law the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). These, as they have been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights and other international jurisdictions, including in tax and religious liberty decisions, should have been applied to the Tai Ji Men case and led to its solution, but they didn’t.
“人權無國界”的聯合創始人兼董事威利·福特(Willy Fautré)表示,台灣是一個民主國家,但沒有一個民主國家是完美的。太極門案讓台灣有機會像照鏡子一樣看到其民主制度的不完善之處。Fautré 說,現在應該立即解決這個問題。
Willy Fautré, co-founder and director of Human Rights Without Frontiers, stated that Taiwan is a democracy, but no democracy is perfect. The Tai Ji Men case offers to Taiwan an opportunity to see, as if in a mirror, what is imperfect in its democratic system. It should now be solved, Fautré said, without delay.
https://bitterwinter.org/scholars-discuss-transitional-justice-tai-ji-men-case/
同時也有56部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過878的網紅時事英文 Podcast by ssyingwen,也在其Youtube影片中提到,就在上週,美國情報分析師預測,Taliban 至少還需要幾週時間才會攻下阿富汗首都。事實上,短短幾天後,Taliban 週日火速佔領 Kabul,美國支持的阿富汗政府迅速瓦解,總統倉促逃離該國。 📝 訂閱講義 & 朗讀稿 (只要 $88 /月):https://bit.ly/ssyingwe...
「international law」的推薦目錄:
- 關於international law 在 官逼民反_人民當家 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於international law 在 外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan) Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於international law 在 劉昱佑 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於international law 在 時事英文 Podcast by ssyingwen Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於international law 在 Shannon’s Diaries Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於international law 在 Dan Lok Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於international law 在 What is international law? An animated explainer - YouTube 的評價
international law 在 外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan) Facebook 的最佳解答
貝里斯支持將台灣納入聯合國及其專門機構
貝里斯總理布里仙紐在聯合國大會中表示,貝國與台灣的外交關係立基於民主、自由、人權及法治等共享價值,貝里斯支持將台灣納入聯合國及其專門機構,這將進一步加強全球合作與夥伴關係,更能體現聯合國的普世性原則。
台灣的夥伴價值,值得聯合國重視。
#貝里斯辣醬配蛋餅超讚
Thank you to #Belize Prime Minister John Briceño for his call for #Taiwan's inclusion in the UN at the #UNGA General Debate:
"Our multilateral system must also be inclusive, harnessing the capacity of all states to scale up international cooperation where it is most needed.
Belize has benefited greatly from our diplomatic partnership with Taiwan that is based on the shared values of democracy, freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. Taiwan has provided tremendous assistance to Belize in terms of medical supplies and financial support, so Belize is better equipped in combating COVID-19 and conducting post- pandemic recovery.
Belize calls for Taiwan’s inclusion in the United Nations and its specialized agencies, which will not only further enhance global cooperation and partnership, but also manifest the United Nation’s enshrined principle of universality."
Taiwan's vision of global partnership can serve as a valuable reference for the UN.
international law 在 劉昱佑 Facebook 的精選貼文
李戡發文指出,某臺大教授的著作有多處抄襲,我看完之後十分駭然。因為張亞中老師曾對蔡英文的論文事件發表評論:「倫敦政經學院不是正規大學」,著實是金玉良言啊!現在張總校長是不是也會發出正義的怒吼:「臺大出這種教授,不是正規大學。」
.
這樣的話,還真的虧大了,因為我才剛拿到畢業證書誒!早知如此,要選最正規的孫文學校就讀。不過似乎不必多慮,前述所指臺大某抄襲教授正是張亞中本人,張總校長是不會自我批評成非正規教授的。心中大石瞬間卸下,所以我拿到的,應該還能算是正規證書吧。
.
———(以下李戡全文)———
.
《張亞中,你抄錯行了!》
.
張亞中1998年出版《兩岸主權論》(台北:生智文化,1998)一書,不止一次抄襲楊永明1996年發表在《政治科學論叢》第七期的論文<民主主權:政治理論中主權概念之演變與主權理論新取向>。關於證明抄襲的方法論、抄襲者慣用的掩蓋手法和心態,我在《蔣介石日記的濫用》(被中共查禁)裡做了充分論證。現在我用這些方法,來還原張亞中怎麼抄襲楊永明,而且還抄錯行。
.
一、《兩岸主權論》第9到10頁,張亞中寫道:
.
國際法百科全書亦將主權定義為「一個國家獨立於其他國家之外,且於法律上不受其他國家的影響,以及國家對其領土和人民的政府權力享有最高性,與排他性的管轄權」。【注釋是「Helmut Steinberger, “Sovereignty”, in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Installment 10., (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing and Company, 1987), pp.397-418, at pp.403-404.」】
.
這段引文,和楊永明<民主主權>頁144的段落幾乎一模一樣:
.
國際法百科全書定義主權為「一個國家獨立於其他國家之外,且於法律上不受其他國家的滲透影響,以及國家對其領土和人民的政府權力的至高性和排他性的管轄權」【注釋是「Helmut Steinberger, “Sovereignty,” in Encyclopedia of International Law, op.cit., p.404.」】
.
楊永明和張亞中都引用了Encyclopedia of Public International Law的內容,不過楊永明漏寫了書名中的Public一字,我們翻開這本書第404頁,可找到楊永明引文對應的原文:
.
State sovereignty now meant a State's general independence from and legal impermeability in relation to foreign powers, and the State's exclusive jurisdiction and supremacy of governmental powers over the State's territory and inhabitants.
.
這段話明明出現在百科全書第404頁,而非第403-404頁,為什麼張亞中會寫成「pp.397-418, at pp.403-404.」?
.
二、這個「兩段式頁數」的寫法,正好出現在楊永明論文頁143-144:
.
為方便區分起見,學者稱描述國家內部的主權概念為「內部主權」(或「國內主權」),而在國際法上的應用則被稱為「外部主權」(或「國家主權」)。【注釋是「See Helmut Steinberger, “Sovereignty,” in Encyclopedia of International Law, Rudolf L. Bindscdhedler et al eds. (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing and Company, 1987), pp.397-418, at pp.403-404.」】
.
我們翻開百科全書,果然分別在第403和404頁看到「external sovereignty」(外部主權)和「internal sovereignty」(內部主權)的用法,說明楊永明的注釋沒問題。奇怪的是,楊永明這段引文,也出現在張亞中《兩岸主權論》第10頁:
.
有些學者區別主權的概念為「內部主權」與「外部主權」,前者指的是描述國家內部的主權;後者指的是國家主權在國際法的運用。【注釋是「Helmut Steinberger, “Sovereignty”, in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, op.cit., p.404.」】
.
由此可見,張亞中抄錯行了!張亞中根本沒看過Encyclopedia of Public International Law這本書,他這兩個出處,都是直接抄襲楊永明。名詞解釋那段,張亞中為了掩飾抄襲痕跡,故意在楊永明翻譯的引文裡改動數字,例如他省略了「滲透」兩字,殊不知這樣一省略,嚴重扭曲原意。換句話說,如果張亞中親自翻過百科全書,根本沒道理漏掉這個字。張亞中改動完楊永明翻譯的引文後,以為大功告成,在抄注釋的時候,卻不小心抄錯行——他該抄的是頁404,卻抄成了楊永明的另一個注釋頁397-418和頁403-404。另外,「內部主權」和「外部主權」那段,張亞中本來該抄頁397-418和頁403-404,卻抄成頁404。
.
三、除此之外,張亞中《兩岸主權論》頁8的引文「國家在其範圍內有宣稱不受其他限制和控制的自由,則必須同樣承認其他國家在其範圍內也有相同的自由。」【注釋是「F. H. Hinsley, Sovereignty (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1966), p.158.」】這段話和楊永明<民主主權>頁144「國家在其範圍內有宣稱不受其他限制和控制的自由,則必須同樣承認其他國家在其範圍內也具有相同的自由」只有一字之差,在張亞中自稱看過原文的情況下,他的中文翻譯和楊永明翻譯的幾乎一模一樣,只是將「具有」換成「有」,顯然構成抄襲。
.
四、同樣道理,張亞中《兩岸主權論》頁20的段落「國際法學界也開始強調民主制度是一項逐漸成形的國際規範,「民主統治」被強調為國家與政府合法性的構成要件之一。」【注釋是「Thomas Frank, “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.86, No.1 (Jan. 1992), pp.46-91.」】這段話,張亞中抄自楊永明<民主主權>頁147的段落「國際法學界也開始強調民主制度是一項逐漸成形的國際規範,民主統治(democratic governance)被強調為國家及政府合法性的構成要件之一。」【注釋是「Thomas Franck, “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance,” American Journal of International Law, Vol.86, No.1 (Jan. 1992), pp.46-91.」】張亞中除了把「及」換成「與」,其他地方一字不漏照抄楊永明。
.
五、同樣道理,張亞中《兩岸主權論》頁20-21的段落「更有學者指出政治參與權已經成為一項普遍性原則,應該受到國際法的保障。」【注釋是「Gregory H. Fox, “The Right to Political Participation in International Law”, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 17(1992), pp.539-607.」】這段話,張亞中抄自楊永明<民主主權>頁147「福斯(Gregory Fox)更指出政治參與權(political participation)已經成為一項普遍性權利,而應該受到國際法的保障。」【注釋是Gregory H. Fox, “The Right to Political Participation in International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 17(1992), pp.539-607.」】張亞中除了把「權利」改成「原則」,其他地方幾乎照抄楊永明。
.
凡是引用的文獻不是自己親手翻閱、而是從別人文章看到的,一定要加上「轉引」兩字,否則就是抄襲。這五個案例中,張亞中在注釋裡除了交代文獻來源,後面全都該加上「轉引自楊永明,<民主主權:政治理論中主權概念之演變與主權理論新取向>,頁XX」,但他都沒有。張亞中讀了兩個博士,必定了解學術規範,卻仍故意為之,有何資格動輒以「張老師」姿態教育別人?光是在《兩岸主權論》的其中一章,張亞中就有五個注釋抄自楊永明。有了這項紀錄,我很好奇張亞中在《歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》(台北:揚智文化,1998)書裡引用的大量英文文獻,以及在《德國問題:國際法與憲法的爭議》(台北:揚智文化,1999)書裡使用的大量艱澀冷僻的德文文獻,其中有多少處可能有類似這樣的行為?
international law 在 時事英文 Podcast by ssyingwen Youtube 的精選貼文
就在上週,美國情報分析師預測,Taliban 至少還需要幾週時間才會攻下阿富汗首都。事實上,短短幾天後,Taliban 週日火速佔領 Kabul,美國支持的阿富汗政府迅速瓦解,總統倉促逃離該國。
📝 訂閱講義 & 朗讀稿 (只要 $88 /月):https://bit.ly/ssyingwen_notes
🏴 延伸閱讀:https://ssyingwen.com/ssep46
🖼️ IG 單字卡: https://bit.ly/ssyingwenIG
😴 8/29 週日預計休息一集,9/1 週三恢復~
———
本集 timestamps
0:00 Intro
1:00 第一遍英文朗讀
3:15 新聞 & 相關單字解說
18:16 額外單字片語
24:23 第二遍英文朗讀
———
臉書社團 (朗讀文字):https://www.facebook.com/groups/ssyingwen/posts/285659919986921/
朗讀內容參考了
The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/17/afghanistan-striking-image-appears-to-show-640-people-fleeing-kabul-in-packed-us-military-plane
AP: https://apnews.com/article/afghanistan-taliban-784681c4400b097cf73b93cec34c5c61
CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/16/middleeast/taliban-control-afghanistan-explained-intl-hnk/index.html
VOA Learning English: https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/kabul-airport-in-chaos-biden-defends-us-withdrawl/6004849.html
———
本集提到的單字片語:
Go down the rabbit hole
Afghanistan 阿富汗
Taliban 神學士 / 塔利班
Kabul 阿富汗的首都
President Ashraf Ghani 阿富汗總統
Vice president 副總統
Senior officials 高官
Tarmac 柏油
Interpol 國際刑警組織
Afghan 阿富汗人 / 阿富汗的
Desperate 絕望
Interpreters 口譯員
Military jet 軍用飛機
Land-locked state 內陸國
South Asia 南亞
Central Asia 中亞
Neighboring countries 鄰近國
Iran 伊朗
Pakistan
巴基斯坦 Uzbekistan
Tajikistan 塔吉克
Turkmenistan 土庫曼
Chaos 混亂
Air traffic control 空中交通管制
Soviet Union 蘇聯
Civil war 內戰
Islamic law 伊斯蘭法律
Haven 避風港、安全的地方
Sanctuary 庇護所
Women’s rights 女性的權利
Chief international correspondent 首席國際通訊記者
Badass 很厲害的人
Commander 指揮官
Hijab 頭巾
Niqab
Burqa
Gut-wrenching
♥️ 喜歡時事英文 podcast 嗎?♥️
你可以支持我繼續錄製 podcast 👉 https://bit.ly/zeczec_ssyingwen
————
#podcast #阿富汗 #神學士 #塔利班 #學英文 #英文筆記 #英文學習 #英文 #每日英文 #托福 #雅思 #雅思英語 #雅思托福 #多益 #多益單字 #播客 #國際新聞 #英文新聞 #英文聽力 #taiwanpodcast
international law 在 Shannon’s Diaries Youtube 的精選貼文
hire me to cook and clean for you! I made oatmeal for breakfast and bolognese for lunch today, actually had so much fun :)) looking forward to the next time we hangout together!!
This has been really fun, if you enjoyed it, I would love to know!!
my jewellery are from Savagems, you can get them from
https://savagems.com/
:))
Thank you for watching :)
follow me on Instagram:
@tsouvlogs
xoxo
till next time!!
international law 在 Dan Lok Youtube 的精選貼文
Coming From A Place Of Lack? Learn To Unlock Your Inner Potential And Get The Master Key To Your Wealth. Discover How In Dan's Bestseller Unlock It- Get Yours For Free Now: https://lawofattractionisntworking.danlok.link
Do you feel like the law of attraction isn't working for you? You are spiritual but money isn't coming in? Watch this to discover the piece you might be missing. Share this video with a fellow spiritual entrepreneur.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Video Highlights ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
0:00 - Intro: When The Law of Attraction Is Not Working For You (Watch This)
1:35 - The Law Of Attraction And Money
3:34 - Spirituality As An Escape
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
? SUBSCRIBE TO DAN'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL NOW ?
https://www.youtube.com/danlok?sub_confirmation=1
? Join my YouTube Membership to get access to EXCLUSIVE perks ?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs_6DXZROU29pLvgQdCx4Ww/join
Check out these Top Trending Playlists -
1.) Boss In The Bentley - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEmTTOfet46OWsrbWGPnPW8mvDtjge_6-
2.) Sales Tips That Get People To Buy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Csz_hvXzw&list=PLEmTTOfet46PvAsPpWByNgUWZ5dLJd_I4
3.) Dan Lok’s Best Secrets - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZNmFJUuTRs&list=PLEmTTOfet46N3NIYsBQ9wku8UBNhtT9QQ
Dan Lok has been viewed more than 1.7+ billion times across social media for his expertise on how to achieve financial confidence. And is the author of over a dozen international bestselling books.
Dan has also been featured on FOX Business News, MSNBC, CBC, FORBES, Inc, Entrepreneur, and Business Insider.
In addition to his social media presence, Dan Lok is the founder of the Dan Lok Organization, which includes more than two dozen companies - and is a venture capitalist currently evaluating acquisitions in markets such as education, new media, and software.
Some of his companies include Closers.com, Copywriters.com, High Ticket Closers, High Income Copywriters and a dozen of other brands.
And as chairman of DRAGON 100, the world’s most exclusive advisory board, Dan Lok also seeks to provide capital to minority founders and budding entrepreneurs.
Dan Lok trains as hard in the Dojo as he negotiates in the boardroom. And thus has earned himself the name; The Asian Dragon.
If you want the no b.s. way to master your financial destiny, then learn from Dan. Subscribe to his channel now.
★☆★ CONNECT WITH DAN ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★
YouTube: http://youtube.danlok.link
Dan Lok Blog: http://blog.danlok.link
Dan Lok Shop: https://shop.danlok.link
Facebook: http://facebook.danlok.link
Instagram: http://instagram.danlok.link
Linkedin: http://mylinkedin.danlok.link
Podcast: http://thedanlokshow.danlok.link
#DanLok #LawOfAttraction #Manifesting
Please understand that by watching Dan’s videos or enrolling in his programs does not mean you’ll get results close to what he’s been able to do (or do anything for that matter).
He’s been in business for over 20 years and his results are not typical.
Most people who watch his videos or enroll in his programs get the “how to” but never take action with the information. Dan is only sharing what has worked for him and his students.
Your results are dependent on many factors… including but not limited to your ability to work hard, commit yourself, and do whatever it takes.
Entering any business is going to involve a level of risk as well as massive commitment and action. If you're not willing to accept that, please DO NOT WATCH DAN’S VIDEOS OR SIGN UP FOR ONE OF HIS PROGRAMS.
This video is about When The Law of Attraction Is Not Working For You (Watch This).
https://youtu.be/exn6Rwj5KCw
https://youtu.be/exn6Rwj5KCw
international law 在 What is international law? An animated explainer - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>