Search
你的碳排，💳信用卡看的見！
🛒你今天shopping了嗎？
你知道買東西會造成二氧化碳排放嗎？
究竟日常的消費行為會產生多少碳排放量呢🤔？
瑞典金融科技公司Doconomy和萬事達信用卡(Master card)合作，推出 #全球首張以碳排為額度的信用卡，命名為「💳DO Black」，可以連結個人消費行為與對應碳排放資訊，若當月消費達到人均碳排上限，信用卡將會被凍結。
這張卡更特別的地方是，可以向持卡人建議適合的「補償方式」，例如透過 #購買符合聯合國認證的碳權，來平衡消費過程中所產生的溫室氣體排放。
未來，如果能讓大眾透過消費的抉擇，成為可計算、可視覺化的減碳成效，從而建立起更明確的減碳觀念，並逐步減少消費、選擇低碳商品，那減碳成果絕對是不容小覷的💪
更多精彩內容請看👉https://mstr.cd/2HotqHG
【#JW部長 接受 #法國 🇫🇷《觀點周刊》專訪】
Bonjour! Ça va?
請把鏡頭轉向法蘭西共和國
魔法部長再度登上國際媒體為台發聲啦！
#台灣不是中國瞄準的唯一國家
這專訪標題可不是隨便下的
雖然「威脅」對我們台灣人是家常便飯
但我們有責任向全世界發出警告
千萬別讓 #捕鼠器 的寓言故事成為國際現實！
這趴專訪的精華內容
小編決定一字一句誠意奉上 (往下滑)
讓我們凝聚共識 #團結一心
持續點亮台灣這座 #亞洲民主燈塔 🌞
#台灣是台灣
#理念相近國家
#新南向政策
Le Point 報導連結 https://reurl.cc/zzgRRN
🔸 歐盟執委會外交暨安全政策高級代表今年6月聲稱中國「不會對世界和平造成威脅」，對台灣而言，應該不是這樣吧？
JW：對歐洲來說，中國很遙遠。但台灣距離中國不到200公里，我們強烈感受到這個威脅。台灣並不是唯一被中國威脅的國家，#日本 對東海問題已有所警覺，中國在南海將島礁軍事化的行為，也迫使 #美國 及 #東南亞國家 做出回應，更別提 #印度 和中國在邊界發生的衝突，中國還妄想對外輸出那套專制政體，看看他們對 #新疆、#西藏 和 #香港 做了什麼「好事」！
🔸 在 #港版國安法 之後，台灣有沒有可能成為下一個目標？
JW：香港發生的事是個悲劇。香港從前是東亞地區自由和法治的典範，但港版國安法使香港 #喪失言論和新聞自由，並且 #破壞法治，香港人卻無從置喙。其中第38條還適用包括台灣公民及地球上所有中國政府認為威脅到它本身政權的其他人，中國想要把它的專制政體國際化，這是必須要阻止的。
🔸 我們應該如何抵禦中國的 #戰狼外交？
JW：明確回擊「戰狼外交」才能符合我們的利益。國際社會，特別是享有共同價值的歐洲、北美和東亞國家，必須協調合作，如果我們能夠團結在這個根本價值之下，就能構成強而有力的力量，來告訴中國：你錯了！
🔸 台灣想要加入WHO，但美國卻要退出；中國在近年已經暗地掌控許多國際組織，現在才要改革，是否太晚？
JW：就算遲了，也比從來不做來的好。我們都看到了 #世界衛生組織 #國際民航組織 和 #國際刑警組織 發生了什麼事。但對我們而言，最慘痛的經驗是 #聯合國。1971年UN大會以2758號決議接受中國為會員國，將蔣介石的代表逐出聯合國，並且把PRC視為中國的唯一合法代表。中國政府扭曲這個決議，要求聯合國秘書處接受它對這個決議的詮釋，聲稱台灣已經是中國的一部分。對於這樣的說法，我們必須很清楚表示：#台灣從來就不是PRC的一部分！
#MOFA Minister Joseph Wu was recently interviewed by French news magazine Le Point. The headline of the article was “Taiwan is not the only country China is targeting,” echoing Minister Wu’s warning to our like-minded democratic partners around the world. You can find excerpts from the interview in English below!
#SharedValues #Democracy #Freedom #Taiwan
🔹 Le Point: Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy said in June that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) “is not a threat to world peace.” But is it a threat to Taiwan?
JW: From Europe’s perspective, China is far away. But Taiwan is just 200 kilometers from China, so we feel this threat very strongly. […] Japan is also aware of the threat in the East China Sea. The militarization of the South China Sea has reached a level that requires a strong response from the United States and the countries of Southeast Asia. That’s without even talking about the clashes on the border between India and China. In addition, the Chinese are trying to export their authoritarian vision of the world. Just look at what they’ve done to Xinjiang and to Tibet, and now to Hong Kong!
🔹 Le Point: After the national security law in Hong Kong, could Taiwan be the next target?
JW: What happened in Hong Kong is a tragedy. Hong Kong was once a model of freedom and the rule of law in East Asia. The National Security Law has deprived it of its freedoms, freedom of expression and freedom of the press, and destroyed its rule of law. Hong Kong people have no say. And according to Article 38, this law is supposed to apply beyond Hong Kong, that is, to me, to the citizens of Taiwan and to anyone on the planet who the Chinese government considers a threat to its regime. We must stop this. China wants to expand its authoritarian international order. And we are now worried that the Chinese government is imposing something on us as well.
🔹 Le Point: How does one defend oneself against Wolf Warrior Chinese diplomacy?
JW: Whether it’s the Chinese foreign ministry or embassies, Chinese diplomats have become very aggressive. Taiwan has known this for a long time. It’s in our interest is to respond clearly to this Wolf Warrior diplomacy. In addition, the international community, and in particular like-minded countries in Europe, North America and East Asia, must work together. If we are united in our core values, it will be enough signal forcefully to China that it is wrong.
🔹 Le Point: You want to join WHO just as the United States is leaving it. For years, China has quietly taken control of international institutions. Isn't it too late to reform them?
JW: No, it is still possible. Better late than never. […] We saw what was happening at the WHO, the International Civil Aviation Organization and Interpol. But it was what happened at the United Nations that was most painful for us to bear. When China was reinstated as a member in 1971, under UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, establishing the People's Republic of China as the sole legal representative of China and kicking the representative of Chiang Kai-shek out of the organization. That’s all this resolution said. It said nothing about Taiwan. The Chinese government twisted this resolution and imposed its interpretation on the UN secretariat, to make it say that Taiwan was already part of China. [...] We must be very clear about this: our island is not is not a part of the People's Republic of China!
Hereby I would like to ask our Foreign Ministry and other nations worldwide to object the WHO Secretariat office for the malicious interpretation of the U.N. Resolution #2758.
Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus shall admit his mistake just as well as Director-General Ban Ki-Moon of U.N. did!!
Mr. Tedros has been ridiculously indicating that Taiwan is part of China using the UN Resolution #2758 and tried to tie Taiwan up with China with the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding, which was exactly what Director-General Ban Ki-Moon did in 2007.
Below I would like to reveal what mistake Ban Ki-Moon has made and the consequences in 2007.
March 2007, Taiwan wanted to join the U.N. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, of which intention was expressed via Nauru Republic. Director-General Ban Ki-Moon of U.N. replied that base on the U.N. Resolution #2758, UN considers Taiwan being a part of China so he cannot accept any documentations addressed under the name of Republic of China(Taiwan).
On 18th July 2007, former President Chen Shui-Bian applied to Ban Ki-Moon asking for the acceptance from the U.N. under the title of Taiwan.
On 23rd of July, UN Secretariat office rejected such claim.
On 27th at California, some reporter asked Ban Ki-Moon why he turned down the application from Taiwan? He also replied that it was due to the UN Resolution #2758 so that PRC is the one and only legitimate representation of China and Taiwan is part of it.
Regarding above statement, US government reacted right away issuing a report with 9 points expressing that US objected the UN asking the world organizations to admit such “Taiwan is part of China, no matter what “ statement.
On 15 August, Ban Ki-Moon acknowledged to the UN Ambassador of US that “UN falsely interpreted Resolution #2758 and shall not make the same mistake later on.”
Today, Mr. Tedros did it again!!!
Our Foreign Minister fought back right away! In my opinion, I suggest our government to mobilize all countries (including the US) referring to what the US did in 2007 to ask worldwide members of WHO to object the interpretation regarding Taiwan status by Mr. Tedros.
WHO Secretariat traded off the sovereignty of Taiwan OFFICIALLY and inevitably harmful to Taiwan if the world keeps silence.
I request Mr. Tedros to apologize and admit his mistake at soonest!!!!
TAIWAN CAN HELP!
AND TAIWAN IS HELPING!!
The whole world PLEASE HELP TAIWAN, TOO.
Professor Naki is an economist who - for the past 50 years - has been tackling the climate crisis through the lens of technological change and economic development. He’s the former deputy general of IIASA in Vienna (Int’l Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) and was a part of the beginning of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change).
To kick off our second season, we speak to Professor Naki on what we need to do to reach our Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.
This is a podcast about how NOT to save the environment. Hosted by Nature N8 (Nate Maynard), an environmental researcher working on energy, ocean, and waste issues.
Send your questions to ask@wastenotwhynot.com
Support us on Patreon: “Waste Not Why Not”
Follow us on Facebook “Waste Not Why Not” and Twitter @wastenotpod
FOOTNOTE
On Nebojsa Nakicenovic (aka Professor Naki):
https://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/TransitionstoNewTechnologies/Nebojsa-Nakicenovic.en.html
On UN Millennium Goals:
https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
On SDG (Sustainable Development Goals): https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
On IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change):
https://www.ipcc.ch
On UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change): https://unfccc.int/about-us/about-the-secretariat
SHOW CREDIT
Host - Nate Maynard (Twitter @N8May)
Producers & Editor - Emily Y. Wu (Twitter @emilyywu), Allison Chan
Researcher - Yu-Chen Lai
Executive Producer - Emily Y. Wu (Twitter @emilyywu)
Brand Design - Thomas Lee
Production Company - Ghost Island Media (www.ghostisland.media)
MB01WR8IJHWPCOG
un secretariat 在 United Nations - A partial view of the UN Secretariat building ... 的推薦與評價
A partial view of the UN Secretariat building eclipses the iconic Chrysler Building in New York City. While UNHQ is located in NYC, ... ... <看更多>