《偽科學打手繼續玩弄科學》
我見某專頁話自己引用左三篇論文去證明佢嘅論點
而我唔知道到底嗰位自稱科學家嘅人有冇認真去睇清楚嗰三篇嘅論文，其中一篇丹麥嘅論文
1. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR3Sd69faOzsR4tdGJsR67W94qBU7oqrEVb0GG2ElyshBt0sBckRp4PzzKU
眼超超醫生已經詳細地分析他們的實驗設計並不能夠套用在香港的處境上
1. Objective: To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers' risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures.
2. Limitation: Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.
當呢一篇丹麥論文嘅作者，已經開宗明義咁講咗呢個研究到底有幾多限制嘅時候，同時亦都將研究嘅objective講得好清楚，係調查係一啲佩戴口罩並不常見或者佩戴口罩並非控制疫情的公共衛生措施的地方，少部份人佩戴口罩到底有沒有保護的效果。
當香港已經有口罩令，而絕大部份的市民亦主動經常佩戴口罩保護自己保護他人的時候，這份研究的methodology跟findings根本不能套用在香港。
另外兩篇論文
2. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/201/4/491/861190
3. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029744
其實研究結果係suggest face mask may reduce respiratory illnesses especially in shared or crowded living setting
作者同時指出使用多重的公共衛生保護措施，如戴口罩和勸洗手，有可能可以減少respiratory illness的傳播以及mitigate influenza pandemic
而我唔知到底呢個自稱係生物科學家嘅作者到底點樣分析文獻同論文，得出戴口罩完全無助減少傳染，實為指鹿為馬。
至於該生物學家一次又一次佢話根本沒有研究支持佩戴口罩防疫，我想她大概不懂使用Google或PubMed吧，隨便搜索一下就已經能夠找到好幾份研究支持並建議佩戴口罩作防疫之用。
4. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186508/?fbclid=IwAR20JbSJe1u-GWXYSIHKu9cgsph-3ljKH__buPZz3wWujVtMIWVC1gyEhEQ
5. Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428176/?fbclid=IwAR2q1GD3dfFVh9Y3P0wSOOvu1kG0pMADZGoua2KZo7eU_6bQxIQXvz0YPwQ
6. Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72798-7
7. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/
8. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6498/1422?utm_campaign=SciMag&utm_source=JHubbard&utm_medium=Facebook
當你追擊得偽科學多，你就會發現好多這種玩弄文字藝術嘅人其實係真心無料，不過佢地有嘅係時間，會不斷talk shit轉話題，再自我感覺良好去話自己係高質argument，玩泥漿摔角玩到你心累唔再同佢地爭論時，佢地就會覺得贏咗。
*留意下佢地永遠錯咗柒咗之後都會扮無嘢
例如Hands only CPR竟然要先擔心aspiration pneumonia、無心跳但又識瘋狂自主呼吸、開口埋口保持氣道暢通但連airway maneuver都唔識、呢兩日加多個胡亂解讀paper
我地要小心提防呢種經常玩弄文字，搬弄似是而非的概念嘅人，頭腦一唔清就會被誤導。
Hopefully this would be the last post about this matter, this is really going nowhere
limitation論文 在 GitHub Terms of Service 的推薦與評價
O. Limitation of Liability. P. Release and Indemnification. Q. Changes to These Terms. R. Miscellaneous. Thank you for using GitHub! ... <看更多>